Building, in the years ahead, toward a nationwide question every candidate for office will be asked — and every answer published, in full, unedited.
In 2037, the United States Constitution turns 250 years old. Right to Redress is using that horizon to build toward a long, nonpartisan conversation about term limits — beginning with the most direct question there is: candidates, what do you actually think about limiting your own time in office?
The 2037 Initiative is not a separate organization, a party, or an endorsement engine. It is a standing practice RTR is building toward: asking every candidate for federal and state office the same two questions, and publishing every answer exactly as given. Nothing rated. Nothing scored. Nothing spun. This page describes that practice and the thinking behind it. The organizational and legal groundwork RTR is completing first is outlined in the 2037 Initiative Master Plan.
This isn't a fringe position or a one-poll finding. Multiple independent national surveys, taken separately, land in the same range.
Support is broad nationally, but the details vary by state — both in what voters say and in what state lawmakers have already done about their own terms. Pick your state to see both.
State-specific voter polling shown above reflects surveys RTR could verify as of July 2026 — it isn't available for every state yet, and where it isn't, the national figure is shown instead, clearly labeled as such. Legislative term-limit status, by contrast, is confirmed for all 50 states.
RTR is completing the organizational and legal groundwork this initiative deserves — a governing board, fiscal sponsorship, and the federal nonprofit filing — before reaching out to any candidate. Nothing on this page is an active request: no candidate is being contacted, no responses are being collected, and no pledge is being asked of anyone yet. This page will be updated when that changes.